Given from the Catholic Broadcasting Station 2SM Sydney Australia
Choose a topic from Vol 3:
You are welcome to ask any questions you please concerning any phase of Catholic doctrine or practice.
It is possible that a man who knew little or nothing of what monastic life demands would think of it as an escape from such troubled prospects. But if he entered for such a reason, it would not be long before he would leave the monastery. If he did not, superiors themselves would give him no option, but would refuse to allow him to make his profession, and would dismiss him as having no vocation for monastic life.
I am afraid not. The disconsolate need diversion, and monastic life is the last place in which to seek diversion. The vow of poverty means the renunciation of private and personal cash; the vow of chastity excludes the consolations of human affection; the vow of obedience curbs the indulgence of one's own sweet will. The discipline and silences from 5 a. m. until 10 at night, alternating between work, study, and regular spiritual exercises would develop into weariness and boredom in no time for one who entered without a high spiritual ideal, a strong will, and above all a happy and bright disposition. Melancholy, gloomy, depressed, and disconsolate people should never dream of monastic life. Probably their application to enter would not be considered; and if they did manage to enter, they would not last.
No. A man enters a monastery in order to live a spiritual life, renouncing the pleasures and possessions the world can offer. He will enter either in the capacity of a lay-brother, or with the intention of becoming a priest. Every moment of the day is mapped out for each class, whether in manual work or study. I myself was engaged in commercial life when I became a Catholic. It is over twenty years now since I entered monastic life; and from experience I can say that I have worked harder and much longer hours than ever I had to do for a boss in commercial life.Subjects who enter monasteries have a long probation before being admitted to permanent vows, and indolent applicants are soon discovered and dismissed as not suitable.
The Catholic Church did not offer the prospect of a cloistered life only in the Middle Ages. From earliest times she has sanctioned celibacy and a single life for the love of Christ. Again, she has opened the doors of monastery and convent to all types. It is a mistake to think that those with little culture or education were denied the privilege. And it is also a mistake to think that all cultured and lofty-minded people entered religion. Plain rough men found a home in the cloister. Intellectual and cultured men more often than not remained in the world. But let us proceed.
That is not so. Your statement implies that all cultured people entered the cloister, and that none but the rough and stupid remained in the outside world. I have shown you that all types were represented in the cloister whether as cultured priests and theologians or as humble lay-brothers. And all types also remained proportionately in the world. And always they were the few who felt called to the not ordinary life in the religious orders. Normally, and in all classes of society, the average man or woman remained amongst those who marry and are given in marriage.
Don't mix up celibacy with any ideas of merely natural policy. The Catholic Church saw an ideal set by Christ and by the Lady Mother of Christ. She discerned the spirit of the Apostles. And when God's grace inspired individual Christians with the desire to consecrate themselves entirely to God, renouncing earthly affections and interests, she sanctioned their aspirations by instituting the religious orders and the cloistered life. Her sanction and encouragement were, of course, deliberate. Nor were those in authority fools. They were thinkers. And they did foresee the results. But the results were not as you imagine them to have been. Firstly, many of those who became cultured, refined, and highly endowed with learning, did so through the influence of the monastery they entered. They would not have done so had they remained in the environment from which they came. And the world benefited by the attainments their vocation alone made possible.Secondly, if you think that the Catholic sanction of celibacy must have such evil results, experience is against you. Remember that, by the very nature of things, the members of the religious orders, and the clergy of the Catholic Church at any given period must be the children of those who did not adopt celibacy. And if Catholic practice meant that the cream of mankind was entirely swept into the cloister leaving only the dull, stupid, rough, and uncultured to multiply, then a full thousand years of the policy ought to leave the Catholic Church utterly decadent and her present clergy brainless. Each generation should leave what you call her "potential flock" less fitted to produce intelligent subjects for her priesthood. Yet the Church has grown, according to the latest figures to 435 millions; never has she had so many priests; and I venture to say that the Church has never had a higher general standard of culture and learning amongst her clergy than at present.
No. But He lived according to the conditions that are essential to monastic life by the observance of poverty, chastity, and obedience. Monasteries did not come into existence until long after the time of Christ. In the early Church many fervent Christians, inspired by the example of Christ, and desiring to imitate Him more closely voluntarily renounced this world's goods by choosing a life of poverty, abandoned all thought of human affection and marriage by vowing their 'lives to God alone in chastity, and tried to practice complete self-renunciation by a spirit of obedience to lawful authorities in the Church. Great numbers went off to live alone in remote places as hermits; and later on, for the sake of mutual edification and discipline, groups vowed to the same type of life began to form communities, and build common dwelling places called monasteries. It is literally true that the monasteries did not make the monks, but the monks made the monasteries. The inspiration of the desire of such complete consecration to Christ however was derived from the express invitation He gave to leave all things in orders to follow Him, and from the example He Himself set of perfect poverty, chastity, and obedience.
From Apostolic times individual Christians renounced marriage and worldly interests, devoting themselves to purely spiritual things and the close imitation of Christ. At first they did this in their own homes. Finding it difficult in such surroundings, many of them became hermits, retiring into solitude to give themselves without distraction to prayer and meditation, together with manual work.In the third century St. Anthony in Egypt grouped a number of such hermits together who agreed to live a community life where all, having similar interests, would be of mutual assistance in serving God. Thus the first beginnings of monastic and convent life arose in the third century insofar as the mere grouping together of pious people is concerned. Why was the system instituted? To enable those drawn to such a life of prayer and virtue by God to find a suitable environment and to have the company and help of others similarly inclined. The nuns are not "shut away" from the outside world. Desiring to renounce the outside world, they leave it. To speak of nuns being shut away from the world suggests that it is against their will. If you decided to leave New Zealand in order to live in Australia, would you like people to ask you why you were banished from New Zealand?