Given from the Catholic Broadcasting Station 2SM Sydney Australia
Choose a topic from Vol 3:
In reality, they do not.Firstly, they are not in their position as Catholics, but as judges.Secondly, it is State authority which grants the divorce, and the judge merely decides whether applicants comply with the conditions laid down by civil law for a civil dissolution of the bond recognized by the State. If the judge is a Catholic, and the applicant is validly married in the sight of God, he does not personally believe that the civil decree of divorce breaks the bond of marriage in the sight of God. He intends merely the withdrawal of State recognition of the marriage and the abolition of civil obligations. He does not believe, and he does not say that the parties are free in conscience and before God to contract a further marriage whilst both parties still live.
The State grants the civil divorce. The Catholic judge who administers the law in the name of the State is not responsible for the law. And he does not sin by declaring that the parties have proved their claim to the decree of divorce permitted by the State. All he intends is the abolition of civil effects due to civil legislation concerning marriages insofar as they are recognized by the State. The validity or the invalidity of such marriages in the eyes of God is not affected by his decision; for this is subject to a legislation higher than that of the State, and over which the Catholic judge knows that he has no jurisdiction.