Given from the Catholic Broadcasting Station 2SM Sydney Australia
Choose a topic from Vol 3:
No. They play their part within due limits, and in a very secondary way only. Every Catholic knows that such external helps to religion have value only insofar as they reflect or stimulate the interior spirit of worship. Without that, they would be but the dead body of religion deprived of its soul.
It is one though by no means the main reason why the Catholic religion has more appeal, and is better adapted to the religious needs of men, than the Protestant forms of religion. It was one of the mistakes of the Reformation that, in those years of heated dissent and violent reaction against the Catholic Church, men tended to sweep away all external Catholic rites and ceremonies, statues, medals, relics, rosary beads, and all such visible and tangible signs of religion. Where the Pharisees, in our Lord's time, went to one extreme, concentrating almost entirely on external rites and neglecting the interior spirit of religion, the Protestant reformers went to the other extreme, and boasted that they would worship God in spirit and in truth, abolishing the superstitious practices of Rome. But a merely interior and spiritual worship of God is not possible to man. We are human beings, consisting of body and soul. We are not pure spirits, or angels. And worship of God offered by men must be both of the senses and of the spirit. A disembodied religion cannot retain its hold over men. And one of two things is happening with Protestantism. Its adherents are either giving up all religion, having neither exterior nor interior religion, or they are either restoring Catholic rites and ceremonies and practices, as High Church Anglicans, or inventing substitute external manifestations and sensible attractions for themselves. Some parsons are talking of introducing films as an aid to religious devotion, which is simply the introduction of "cinematographic images" as opposed to the "static images" in Catholic Churches they once so vehemently denounced. They are at least beginning to see that the only sane doctrine is that which Catholics have ever maintained, namely, that true religion in practice must blend both interior worship with external and sensible helps. So the dispute is not so much whether we may have external and material aids to religion, but as to what those aids shall be. Meantime, is not the success of Catholicism as opposed to Protestantism, which you admit at least as regards its hold upon men, an indication of its rightness rather than of its wrongness? Surely God's wisdom would provide a religion which does cater for the deepest needs of man according to all the factors contributing to his personality.
We can consider Jesus, Mary, and Joseph in their human and natural characteristics, as members of the Jewish race; or we can dwell upon the ideals for which they stand. If we desired to convey to the Chinese their national characteristics, we would have to depict them as Jewish.But if we wish to convey to the Chinese the ideals for which the Holy Family stands, it is better to depict the members of the Holy Family, not as foreigners, but as of the Chinese and for the Chinese. Catholicism, of its very nature, rises above national considerations. Our Lord has to be born of some particular race, since mankind was divided into particular races. But He was not born for a particular race. He is for all mankind.The idea of presenting the Holy Family to the Chinese in their particular style and on a level they can easily grasp is based on the same principle as that of God, who revealed Himself to men in language and analogies proper to men, and not proper to God. Any good teacher must convey the truth to those taught, in the way best calculated to benefit the recipient. No matter how much a superior person knows, he is no good as a teacher unless he can understand and adapt himself to the lesser capacity of his pupils.
The title is derived from an image of the Child Jesus preserved in a Carmelite Church in Prague. It has been reverenced in that Church since 1628. Sometime prior to this it appears that a religious community was in grave temporal want. A noble Bohemian lady named Princess Von Lobkowiyz brought them a small image of the Infant Jesus, telling the religious that it would bring them a great blessing if they honored it for the love of the Child Jesus whom it represented. It brought many spiritual and temporal blessings upon them, and rapidly became quite a public devotion. Pope Pius X declared that this devotion should inspire parents to invoke upon their children the special protection of the Child Jesus, and to train them to love Him and to imitate the virtues of His infancy and childhood at Nazareth.Devotion to the Holy Infant of Prague is one of those free matters for Catholics and not of any obligation. Those who feel drawn to it may adopt it. The spirit of the devotion enkindles the virtues so particularly associated with the Child Jesus - innocence and purity, humility and obedience.
The halo originated probably in Greece, centuries before the Christian era. Men had noticed the circular luminous glow around the moon, for example, and in various other natural reflections in water and in crystals. Such phenomena of light were naturally chosen to symbolize the light of heroic examples and lofty dignity. The Greeks first applied the idea to the gods, the classical poets describing them as veiled in luminous clouds and radiating light.Christian artists saw the truth and beauty of the symbolism. The only thing wrong was that the Greek pagans were applying it to false gods. The Christian artists but adapted it to the truth as a symbol of true virtue and luminous saintly ideals. In paintings, of course, it was easy to paint a luminous circle about the head of Christ, or of our Lady, or of a saint. In sculpture, the difficulty was overcome by the attaching of a disc behind or above the head of the figure.